Skip to content

H809 – Research methods – strengths and weaknesses (A2.4)

February 13, 2011

The tables below list the strength and weaknesses that Wegerif and Mercer identified in their paper. It also involves further strengths and weaknesses (written in italics) I recall from my previous study or found with additional research.

Click on the images to enlarge them or download the H809_A2.4 Word document (doc) or H809_A2.4 PDF-file here.

References

Wegerif, R. and Mercer, N. (1997) ‘Using computer-based text analysis to integrate qualitative and quantitative methods in research on collaborative learning’, Language and Education, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 271–86.

Open University (2005) K221 Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Structures and Safeguards, Chapter 9 ‘Evaluating CAM practice’ in Le-Treweek, G., Heller, T., MacQueen H., Stone, J. and Spurr, S., Milton Park, Routledge.

Advertisements

From → H809

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: